Introduction Key Stories Opinion Key Players Matching Game Coffee Guests Overnight Guests Discussions Web Links


Politics Section
Special Reports


Introduction

Part 1: Big Money
The Cost of Winning
Part 2: The Issues
What's For Sale?
Part 3: Past Reforms
A Look at the Laws
Part 4: Soft Money
A Look at the Loopholes
Part 5: The Allegations
The Excesses of '96
Part 6: Where It Stands
Today's Reform Proposals

Part 3:
The Past Reforms - A Look at the Laws

Campaign finance rules were dramatically overhauled in the 1970s. The first major set of reforms was signed into law in early 1972 by Richard Nixon – whose reelection committee then went on to funnel illegal corporate contributions into slush funds, pay for break-ins and trade cash for favors. After the Watergate hearings, campaign laws were toughened once again.

The Federal Election Campaign Act amendments of 1974:

  • Established strict disclosure requirements for campaign donations;
  • Set specific limits for those donations;
  • Instituted public financing of presidential elections;
  • And established the Federal Election Commission (FEC) to be the campaign police.

    From the FEC

    _ Public Funding of Presidential Elections

    _ The FEC and the Federal Campaign Finance Law

    The public financing of presidential elections, first administered in 1976, remains controversial – and widely misunderstood. The basic idea is that it's worth spending tax dollars to replace a system that encourages the unchecked solicitation of private money.

    Here's how it works: Fueled by the voluntary checkoff on tax forms (now $3), the Presidential Election Campaign Fund matches up to $250 of each contribution made to eligible primary candidates. In return, the candidates must promise that they will limit spending to a certain amount and follow certain other rules. Then, in the general election season, the presidential candidates receive a lump sum in return for not accepting any further private donations.

    Contribution limits


    To a candidate or candidate committee per primary or general election To a national party committee per year To any other political committee per year Total per calendar year
    Individuals $1,000$20,000$5,000$25,000
    PACs $5,000$15,000$5,000No limit
    Source: Federal Election Commission

    In 1996, for example, the Clinton and Dole campaigns each received about $75 million in taxpayer money after promising not to spend more than $111 million (with a few exemptions).

    The 1974 legislation also established contribution limits and rules about disclosure remain that remain in effect to this day. For instance, campaigns must name all contributors who donate more than $200 in a year.

    From the full text of the
    Buckley v. Valeo decision:

    A restriction on the amount of money a person or group can spend on political communication during a campaign necessarily reduces the quantity of expression by restricting the number of issues discussed, the depth of their exploration, and the size of the audience reached. This is because virtually every means of communicating ideas in today's mass society requires the expenditure of money.

    Two major parts of the 1974 legislation were struck down by the Supreme Court. The post-Watergate amendments had also established mandatory spending limits – restricting total spending for all federal races, and even limiting independent spending on behalf of federal candidates.

    Those provisions were struck down by the Supreme Court in 1976, which ruled in Buckley v. Valeo that they violated the First Amendment. The court also struck down a provision that would have limited how much money a candidate can contribute to his or her own campaign.

    But by and large, the reforms seemed to be doing what they were intended to do.

    For a while. Next

    © Copyright 1998 Digital Ink Company

    Back to the top

    Go to Campaign Finance Report | Go to Politics Section



  • WashingtonPost.com
    Navigation image map
    Home page Site Index Search Help! Home page Site Index Search Help!