Jobs at USA
02/11/98- Updated 11:59 PM ET|
Babbitt case: A question of truthfulness
WASHINGTON - The investigation of Interior Secretary Bruce Babbit
is focused on whether he has been truthful with members of Congress
about his department's decision to reject a casino proposal from
three Chippewa tribes. But in the end it could expand into a broader
probe of campaign fund-raising abuses at the White House.
Attorney General Janet Reno asked Wednesday for the help of an
The controversy is rooted in a 1994 application by the three tribes
and a Miami-based company to turn a 3-year-old Hudson, Wis., dog
track into a casino.
The Bureau of Indian Affairs in Minneapolis recommended in November
1994 that Washington approve the plan despite strong opposition
from other tribes.
But Republicans allege that the promise of campaign donations
made to the Democratic National Committee (DNC) influenced the
decision to reject the application. Babbitt denies the charge.
The timeline of events:
- Between May 1995 and November 1996, tribes opposing the casino
and their lobbyists donated more than $300,000 to the DNC.
- In July 1995, Babbitt met with law school classmate Paul Eckstein,
who was lobbying on behalf of the casino. Eckstein has said that
Babbitt told him that White House deputy chief of staff Harold
Ickes was putting pressure on him about the casino. Later that
day, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs Michael Anderson
rejected the casino, citing an earlier recommendation from career
civil servant George Skibine.
- Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., later questioned Babbitt about
whether the casino decision had been influenced by campaign donations.
In August 1996, Babbitt sent McCain a letter denying that the
White House pressured his department.
- Last October, Eckstein told the Senate Governmental Affairs
Committee about his 1995 meeting with Babbitt and his comments
about pressure from Ickes.
- In October 1997, the Justice Department task force began investigating
whether Babbitt had lied to Congress. Their investigation intensified
Oct. 30 when Babbitt went before the same Senate Governmental
Affairs Committee and admitted that he had invoked Ickes' name
during his meeting with Eckstein. Babbitt said he did so in an
"awkward" effort to get Eckstein, a former law partner,
out of his office without hurting his feelings. He has reiterated
that point on several occasions, saying he he made "a mistake."
Babbitt has also said that he never met with or talked with Ickes
about the casino.
Although investigators found no evidence that the promise of campaign
contributions had influenced the casino decision, Reno said in
a letter to the special panel that appoints independent counsels
that the task force could not determine if Babbitt had been dishonest
during sworn testimony to Congress.
Although Reno has asked for a narrow investigation, Justice officials
expect this probe to expand into campaign fund-raising.
By Gary Fields, USA TODAY
a division of Gannett Co. Inc.